Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Sky Blue and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than the LG K62, getting a 79.3 score against 78.2. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an extremely older phone than LG K62, but it's thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much sharper display than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher count of pixels per screen inch and a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG K62 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K62 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG K62 also has a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor, a lot less megapixels back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The LG K62 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.