Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Titan gray |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG K92 has 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it gives some extra features and enhanced performance. The LG K92 is a way newer cellphone than the Galaxy S6 edge+, but it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a brighter screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG K92 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. LG K92 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size. LG K92 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a back camera with a way better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG K92 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.