Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Holographic white |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 76.7. The Galaxy S6 edge+ construction is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than LG Stylo 6, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
LG Stylo 6 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per display inch and a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with just a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a better 16 MP resolution camera in the back. The LG Stylo 6 has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 6 has superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.