Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a global score of 81.3 against 79.3. LG V35 ThinQ's design is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse 2560 x 1440px resolution and a bit inferior pixel amount per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ's camera is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.