Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue and White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. The LG V60 ThinQ design is much newer than Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is incredibly heavier and extremely thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more mega pixels back camera and a larger aperture.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V60 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.