Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with a score of 89.6 against 79.3. Even though the Motorola edge is extremely newer than Galaxy S6 edge+, it is way thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but Motorola edge has 10 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it provides some additional features.
The Motorola edge counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 7 more cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola edge has a way better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a camera with a lot better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola edge features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola edge has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola edge costs more money than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.