Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's overall score of 78.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's a bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.