Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a 79.3 score against 77. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. Galaxy S6 edge+ is an incredibly older phone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 7 less processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.