Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy S6 edge+, having an 83.4 score against 79.3. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer cellphone than the Galaxy S6 edge+, although it's extremely thicker and way heavier.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit better display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and less cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a lot more MP camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.