Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s overall score of 79.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is a lot newer than Galaxy S6 edge+'s, but it is noticeably heavier and much thicker. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rates, a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.