Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a overall score of 79.3 against 79.3. Galaxy S6 edge+'s design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than the Moto G Stylus (2021), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Moto G Stylus (2021) has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus (2021). If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Stylus (2021), and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.