Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 79.3 score against 76. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S6 edge+ is a lot older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's body is much lighter and a lot thinner. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a way better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 7 less CPU cores (although faster) and lesser RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.