Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 86.2 score against 79.3. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is way newer, but much thicker and much heavier than Galaxy S6 edge+. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, so it offers some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel density.
Moto G200 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.