Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, with a global score of 79.3 against 77.8. Both devices in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11. Even though Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is notably older than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's design is much thinner and extremely lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density. The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G51 5G also has 7 more processing cores (although they are slower). Moto G51 5G features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video, a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.