Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G60 has a global score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. Moto G60's design is notably newer, but way heavier and a lot thicker than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. These phones include Android OS, but Moto G60 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, giving a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels number per inch in the display. Motorola Moto G60 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a greater number of cores.
The Moto G60 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G60 also has a much better resolution back camera. Moto G60 features a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G60 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Moto G60 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.