Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is much older than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's construction is noticeably thinner and way lighter. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better looking display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Moto G9 Power features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G9 Power also has 7 more cpu cores (but slower).
The Moto G9 Power takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera. The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.