Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass; metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older phone than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, but it is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little worse screen density, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a quite larger display.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has 3 more cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ have similar cameras, and although the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bigger aperture and a camera with a way higher 21 MP resolution, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 17 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.