Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s body is older, a bit heavier and thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy S6 edge+ features a slightly better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments and a bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.