Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a general score of 81.6 against 79.3. Although Motorola One 5G Ace is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it is heavier and way thicker. Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has 7 more processing cores. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola One 5G Ace has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola One 5G Ace is also cheaper than the Galaxy S6 edge+, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.