Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than the Motorola One Action, it's construction is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola One Action features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Action also has 7 more cpu cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
Motorola One Action has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Action has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.