Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with an 87 score against 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer than Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a superior processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display pixels density.
Motorola razr (2020) has a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a much more mega pixels camera and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has just a bit better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S6 edge+. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy S6 edge+, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.