Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) is a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a score of 81.1 against 79.3. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2022) has 12 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Motorola razr (2022)'s construction is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's way heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Motorola razr (2022) features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Motorola razr (2022) has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Motorola razr (2022) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a back facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.