Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 15 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a score of 79.3 against 79.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a way better video resolution and a bigger aperture. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.