Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a global score of 79.3 against 76. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an way older phone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a superior processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with just a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher display pixel density.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a back facing camera with way more MP and higher video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.