Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 79.3 against 77.4. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an incredibly older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it is thinner and a lot lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it has 7 less cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A15 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A15 5G has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A15 5G, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.