Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 general score. Although the Galaxy S6 edge+ is notably older than Samsung Galaxy A22, it's body is somewhat thinner and lighter. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A22 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A22 also has a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much higher pixels density.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in low-light environments and a lot less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A22 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.