Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's body is extremely newer, but notably heavier and thicker than the Galaxy S6 edge+.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM and less CPU cores (although faster). The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.