Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, having a overall score of 91.3 against 79.3. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater pixel count in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.