Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a global score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, giving lots of additional features. Although Samsung Galaxy F23 is thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it's a lot lighter and also notably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy F23 also has 7 more processing cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ has a better looking screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.