Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Galaxy S6 edge+, with a 97.6 score against 79.3. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy S6 edge+, but it is extremely heavier.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Galaxy Fold has a better processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.