Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, blue and white |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | PLS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy M12 has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M12 has 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Galaxy M12 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Galaxy S6 edge+, although it is much heavier and way thicker.
The Galaxy M12 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy M12 also has 7 more cores (although they are slower). Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a much better number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy M12 features a bit better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels. Galaxy M12 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M12 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.