Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 score. The Galaxy S6 edge+ design is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy M20, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
Galaxy M20 features a little better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy M20 also has more CPU cores (although they are slower). Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a camera with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution, a much better video quality and a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy M20 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.