Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s overall score of 79.3. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way newer device than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but it is incredibly heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a lot better resolution camera, a way higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger sensor.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.