Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass; metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Galaxy S6 edge+, with a global score of 89.7 against 79.3. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is much newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S6 edge+. Galaxy S10 Lite has a better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.