Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Galaxy S6 edge+, having a 98 score against 79.3. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is much newer, but notably thicker and heavier than the Galaxy S6 edge+.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.