Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s global score of 79.3. The Galaxy Z Flip body is way newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy S6 edge+. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a little better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.