Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s general score of 79.3. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but both have the same thickness. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it counts with some nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a just a little higher screen pixel density. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. If you want to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.