Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a 94.6 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but both have the same thickness. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, giving you some extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more powerful processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more cpu cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.