Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with a score of 90.6 against 79.3. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much heavier than Galaxy S6 edge+, it's a little thinner and incredibly newer. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per display inch.
Galaxy S6 edge+ captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.