Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a more recent 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is way newer, but much thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy S6 edge+.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixels count per inch of display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, higher video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.