Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blasting black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably newer device than Galaxy S6 edge+, although it is heavier and a lot thicker.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 7 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S6 edge+ has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.