Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's global score of 78.7. Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is notably older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's construction is thinner and lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low light situations and a back camera with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.