Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 83.8 score against 79.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a noticeably newer device than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, although it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S6 edge+ has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a greater performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.