Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black |
| Glass; metal | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a score of 88.9, which is better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 global score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has 10 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, counting with a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha design is notably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, but it's incredibly heavier and notably thicker.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a lot better resolution camera, a larger camera aperture and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.