Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 score. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even though it was released many years before. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a higher number of faster cores. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.