Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, it's design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has 7 more processing cores.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.