Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but it's thinner and lighter anyway.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a higher number of cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel density.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, a much smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a much worse image quality and a lot less mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.