Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | -- |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ design is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an older 5.1 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a lot better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.