Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a 79.3 score against 77.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better display density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and less RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.