Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass; metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 77.2. Even though Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it's body is lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has improved battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.